Consistency:
Frequent or recurring competition between the opponents
Fan quote: “Twice a year every year since 1960”
Conflict with a highly salient outgroup that poses acute threat and enhancement to ingroup identity and/or esteem.
A thorough explanation can be found in Tyler & Cobbs (2015), but in short, 10 main ingredients fall into three categories: Conflict Conditions, Strong Similarity, and Deep Differences.
Consistency:
Frequent or recurring competition between the opponents
Fan quote: “Twice a year every year since 1960”
Conspicuous Moments:
Memorable incident—positive or negative—between competitors
Fan quote: “Dustin Brown’s hit on Rosival in 2011 playoffs”
Conspicuous Characters:
Extraordinary individuals (performers, personalities, legacies)
Fan quote: “Brady vs. Manning”
Competitiveness:
Comparable success (recent/historic) or uncertainty of outcome
Fan quote: “2 historically great teams”
Spatial Proximity:
Competitors are located close to each other
Fan quote: “When you grow up with two schools in close proximity, you get a lot of arguing from peers”
Synonymous Values/Appearance:
Shared values/appearance between opponents or supporters
Fan quote: “Similar institutions with similar missions and proud histories”
Shared Supply Pool:
Competition for labor talent and/or other resources
Fan quote: “Both teams often recruit some of the same players in the Midwest Region”
Dominance:
One competitor aspires to overcome the historical success or dominance of the other
Fan quote: “We usually get our asses kicked”
Disparate Values/Appearance:
Conflicting values/appearance between opponents or supporters
Fan quote: “Islanders-Rangers rivalry is basically built on the blue-collar hardworkers versus the haughty rich city folk“
Discrimination by Authority:
Perceived preferential treatment by competition regulators
Fan quote: “League caters heavily to facilitate NYRB’s success”
We also ask respondents about their feelings and reactions toward rivals, as well as why their favorite team and the teams to which respondents allocate points should be considered rivals.
Rivalry Points: The survey asked respondents to allocate 100 “rivalry points” across opponents of their favorite teams. For instance, if John’s favorite team is the Springfield Isotopes, he may choose to allocate 60 points to the Shelbyvillians, whom he considers to be the Isotopes’s strongest rival, 30 points to the Norsemen, another opposing team he considers to be a rival of the Isotopes, and 10 points to the Woodchucks, a third opponent. Maria is another Isoptopes fan, and she chooses to allocate all 100 points to the Norsemen, the only team she considers to be a rival.
The rivalry score is calculated by taking the average point total toward a rival from all a team’s respondents. The maximum rivalry score is 100, which would mean all respondents listed that team as the lone rival. In our example above, the rivalry score for the Norsemen would be 65, which is the average of John’s 30 points and Maria’s 100 points (Shelbyvillians = 30 points, Woodchucks = 5 points).
The rivalry dyad score (or ‘aggregate score’) is calculated by adding respondents’ average rivalry score toward a particular opponent to the opposing average score of that opponent’s fans. In our example above, if the Norsemen fans held a rivalry score of 50 for the Isotopes, the rivalry dyad score for Isotopes-Norseman would be 115 (65 from Isotopes fans toward the Norseman, and 50 from the Norseman toward the Isotopes). The maximum aggregate score is 200, where all respondents of both teams allocated all 100 rivalry points to the same opponent, and every respondent of the opponent reciprocated with 100 points.
The rivalry dyad difference (or ‘difference score’) is calculated by subtracting respondents’ average rivalry score toward a particular opponent from the opposing average score of that opponent’s fans. Continuing the same example from above, the rivalry dyad difference between the Isotopes and Norseman would be 15 (Isotopes 65 score toward Norseman subtracted from Norseman fans’ score of 50 toward Isotopes). For difference scores, larger numbers indicated more unbalanced rivalries, where one team’s fans are allocating many rivalry points to an opponent whose own fans do not reciprocate with a high allocation of their own rivalry points.
In August 2013, we began by surveying college football fans from Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS, or Division I-A) teams using on an online questionnaire posted on almost 200 fan message boards. In the Know Rivalry survey, we ask sports fans about ‘rivalry points,’ as well as respondent identification with the team, feelings and schadenfreude toward opponents and/or their fans, behavioral measures of bias, and basic demographic questions.
Tyler, B. D., Cobbs, J., Nichols, B. S., Dalakas, V. (2021). Schadenfreude, rivalry antecedents, and the role of perceived sincerity in sponsorship of sport rivalries. Journal of Business Research, 124(January), 708-719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.029
Nichols, B. S., Cobbs, J., & Tyler, B. D. (2020). Rival Team Effects in Cause-related Sports Marketing. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 21(1), 23-45. doi: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSMS-01-2019-0010/full/html
Tyler, B. D., Cobbs, J., Xantos, Y. K. (2019). The Roots of Rivalry: Elements and Core Characteristics of Sport Rivalry. In Cody T. Havard (Ed.), Understanding Rivalry and Its Influence on Sports Fans (pp. 1-37). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
www.igi-global.com/chapter/the-roots-of-rivalry/225526
Cobbs, J., Martinez del Campo del Castillo, D., Tyler, B. D., & Ditter, J. (2019). Regional variation in rivalry: Canadians really are friendlier. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 31(3), 191-202. doi: 10.1080/08961530.2018.1531364
Tyler, B. D., Morehead, C., Cobbs, J. B., & DeSchriver, T. D. (2017). What is rivalry? Old and new approaches to specifying rivalry in demand estimations of spectator sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(4), 204-222. URL
Cobbs, J. B., Sparks, D., & Tyler, B. D. (2017). Comparing rivalry effects across professional sports: National Football League fans exhibit most animosity. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(4), 235-246. URL
Cobbs, J. B. & Tyler, B. D. (2017). The genesis of team rivalry in the New World: Sparks to fan animosity in Major League Soccer. Soccer & Society. doi: 10.1080/14660970.2017.1399609
Parrish, C. T., & Tyler, B. D. (2017). Superclásicos and rivalry antecedents: Exploring soccer club rivalries in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. Soccer & Society. doi: 10.1080/14660970.2017.1399604
Tyler, B. D. & Cobbs, J. B. (2017). All rivals are not equal: Clarifying misrepresentations and discerning three core properties of rivalry. Journal of Sport Management, 31, pp 1-14. DOI:10.1123/jsm.2015-0371
Tyler, B. D. & Cobbs, J. B. (2015). Rival conceptions of rivalry: Why some competitions mean more than others. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(2), 227-248, DOI:10.1080/16184742.2015.1010558
Full Paper
Cobbs, J., Star, S., & Tyler, B. D. (2023, March [postponed from 2022]). Rivalry Dispersion Theory: Are multiple rivals good for society? Research presented at the World Association for Sport Management Conference [WASM], Doha, Qatar.
Cobbs, J., Tyler, B. D., Truta, T. M., & Nichols, B. (2022, August). Mitigating antisocial effects in college football rivalries. Research presented at the summer meeting of the American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.
Cobbs, J., Star, S., & Tyler, B. D. (2022, February 18). Do the ingredients to rivalry influence antisocial outcomes? A multi-sport exploration. Research presented at the Applied Sport Management Association Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
Cobbs, J., Nichols, B. S., & Tyler, B. D. (2019, November 7). Rivalry and player involvement effects in cause-related sports marketing. Research presented at the annual meeting of the Sport Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.
**Winner, Best Paper Award for Conference**
Tyler, B. D., Cobbs, J., & Star, S. (2019, October 17). Rivalry in the Indian Premier League. Research presented at the World Association for Sport Management [WASM] Conference, Santiago, Chile.
Cobbs, J., Nichols, B. S., Tyler, B. D., & Dalakas, V. (2019, August 9). Navigating the culture war in sponsorship of rivalries. Research presented at the American Marketing Association Summer Educators' Conference, Chicago, IL.
Tyler, B. D., Cobbs, J., & Dalakas, V. (2018, March 9). Schadenfreude and rivalries: Implications for sponsors. Research presented at the Sport Marketing and Sponsorship Conference, San Diego, CA.
Morehead, C., Cobbs, J. B., DeSchriver, T. D., & Tyler, B. D. (2017, October). Accounting for rivalry in estimations of demand in MLS and the NHL. Research presented at the Annual Conference for the Sport Marketing Association (SMA), Boston, MA.
Xantos, Y., Laumann, M., Harris, S., Cobbs, J. B., & Tyler, B. D. (2017, October). Sparks to the rivalry fire: Comparing the antecedents to rivalry across professional sports. Research presented at the Annual Conference for the Sport Marketing Association (SMA), Boston, MA.
Nichols, B., Cobbs, J. B., & Tyler, B. D. (2017, August). Data-driven approaches to cause-related sports marketing: Conflicting effects of rival team presence. Research presented at the Summer Conference for the American Marketing Association (Summer AMA), San Francisco, CA.
Cobbs, J. B. & Tyler, B. D. (2017, June). Rivalry in Major League Soccer: Antecedents to rival fan discrimination. Research presented at the Annual Conference for the North American Society for Sport Management (NASSM), Denver, CO.
Sparks, D., Cobbs, J. B., Tyler, B. D., & Gardner, J. (2016, November). Measuring rivalry across professional leagues: Is animosity consistent across sports? Research presented at the Annual Conference for the Sport Marketing Association (SMA), Indianapolis, IN. Presentation slides
Folz, A., & Cobbs, J. (2016, November). The spoils of championships: Fan identification, envy, and rivalry. Research presented at the Annual Conference for the Sport Marketing Association (SMA), Indianapolis, IN. Poster (pdf)
Ditter, J., Cobbs, J., Tyler, B. D., & Nichols, B. S., (2016, November). Rivalry variation by geographic region: Are Canadians really more friendly? Research presented at the Annual Conference for the Sport Marketing Association (SMA), Indianapolis, IN. Presentation slides
Tyler, B. D., & Cobbs, J. (2016, August). Why is rivalry important to college football fans? A comparative analysis of 12 elements. Research presented at the Summer Educators Conference for the American Marketing Association (AMA), Atlanta, GA.
Tyler, B. D. & Cobbs, J. B. (2014, May). Visualizing rivalry intensity: A Social Network Analysis of fan perceptions. Research presented at the meeting of the North American Society for Sport Management (NASSM), Pittsburgh, PA.
Full Abstract | Presentation Slides
Tyler, B. D. & Cobbs, J. B. (2009, October). Advancing toward an understanding of sport rivalry. Paper presented at the meeting of the Sport Marketing Association (SMA), Cleveland, OH.
Full Paper
Academic Course: Cobbs, J. B. (2015). Website for SpB 200: Rivalry & Ritual in International Sport
Alvarado-Karste, D. & Kidwell, B. (2021). The anatomy of a rivalry: The role of resentment in the development of brand attitudes. Journal of Product & Brand Management, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2019-2573
Amani, D. (2019). Fan Identification, Brand Community Identification, and Oppositional Brand Loyalty towards Sponsors of a Rival Sports Team: The Mediating Role of Schadenfreude: Journal of Business and Behavioural Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.003.2.02
Ambrose, S. C., & Schnitzlein, N. (2017). What makes for the best rivalries in individual sports and how can marketers capitalize on them? Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(4), 223–234.
Angell, R. J., Gorton, M., Bottomley, P., & White, J. (2016). Understanding fans’ responses to the sponsor of a rival team. European Sport Management Quarterly, 16(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2015.1135975
Armstrong, G., & Giulianotti, R. (Eds.). (2001). Fear and loathing in world football. Berg Publishers.
Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
Bee, C., & Dalakas, V. (2015). Rivalries and sponsor affiliation: Examining the effects of social identity and argument strength on responses to sponsorship-related advertising messages. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(6), 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.828768
Bee, C., King, J., & Stornelli, J. (2019). Are you with us or against us? The role of threat and anger in sport sponsorship. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.048
Benkwitz, A. & Molnar, G. (2012). Interpreting and exploring football fan rivalries: An overview. Soccer & Society, 13, 479-494.
Berendt, J., & Uhrich, S. (2016). Enemies with benefits: The dual role of rivalry in shaping sports fans’ identity. European Sport Management Quarterly, 16(5), 613–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2016.1188842
Berendt, J., & Uhrich, S. (2018). Rivalry and fan aggression: Why acknowledging conflict reduces tension between rival fans and downplaying makes things worse. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(4), 517–540.https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1424226
Berendt, J., Uhrich, S., & Thompson, S. A. (2018). Marketing, get ready to rumble—How rivalry promotes distinctiveness for brands and consumers. Journal of Business Research, 88, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.015
Bergkvist, L. (2012). The Flipside of the Sponsorship Coin. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), 65–73.
Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1992). Physiological arousal and reactions to outgroup members during competitions that implicate an important social identity. Aggressive Behavior, 18(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<85::AID-AB2480180202>3.0.CO;2-9
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
Brick, D. J., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017). Oppositional brand choice: Using brands to respond to relationship frustration. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.10.002
Cikara, M., Botvinick, M. M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Us Versus Them: Social Identity Shapes Neural Responses to Intergroup Competition and Harm. Psychological Science, 22(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610397667
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Stereotypes and Schadenfreude: Affective and Physiological Markers of Pleasure at Outgroup Misfortunes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611409245
Cobbs, J., Martinez del Campo del Castillo, D., Tyler, B. D., & Ditter, J. (2019). Regional Variation in Rivalry: Canadians Really are Friendlier. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2018.1531364
Cobbs, J., Sparks, D., & Tyler, B. D. (2017). Comparing rivalry effects across professional sports: National Football League fans exhibit most animosity. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(4), 235–246.
Cobbs, J., & Tyler, B. D. (2018). The genesis of team rivalry in the New World: Sparks to fan animosity in Major League Soccer. Soccer & Society, 19(5–6), 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2017.1399609
Coleman, N. V., Williams, P., & Morales, A. C. (2019). Identity Threats, Compensatory Consumption, and Working Memory Capacity: How Feeling Threatened Leads to Heightened Evaluations of Identity-Relevant Products. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy060
Converse, B. A., & Reinhard, D. A. (2016). On rivalry and goal pursuit: Shared competitive history, legacy concerns, and strategy selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000038
Dalakas, V., & Melancon, J. P. (2012). Fan identification, Schadenfreude toward hated rivals, and the mediating effects of Importance of Winning Index (IWIN). Journal of Services Marketing, 26(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041211199724
Davies, F., Veloutsou, C., & Costa, A. (2006). Investigating the Influence of a Joint Sponsorship of Rival Teams on Supporter Attitudes and Brand Preferences. Journal of Marketing Communications, 12(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260500264574
de Amorim, J. G. B., & de Almeida, V. M. C. (2015). The effect of simultaneous sponsorship of rival football teams. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2015140059
Delia, E. B. (2015). The exclusiveness of group identity in celebrations of team success. Sport Management Review, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2014.10.006
Demir, E., & Rigoni, U. (2017). You lose, i feel better: Rivalry between soccer teams and the impact of schadenfreude on stock market. Journal of Sports Economics, 18(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002514551801
Diel, S., Buck, C., & Eymann, T. (2018). Your smartphone, my smartphone—How smartphone ownership determines social group affiliation. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 51, 5373–5381. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.669
Dmowski, S. (2013). Geographical typology of European football rivalries. Soccer & Society, 14, 331-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2013.801264
Ewing, M. T., Wagstaff, P. E., & Powell, I. H. (2013). Brand rivalry and community conflict. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.017
Fiske, S. T. (2010). Envy up, scorn down: How comparison divides us. American Psychologist, 65(8), 698–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.65.8.698
Gil-Lopez, T., Ahmed, S., & Taylor, L. D. (2017). Understanding Fandom in the Multilingual Internet: A Study of “El Clásico” Fans’ Commenting Behavior on YouTube. International Journal of Sport Communication, 10(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2016-0114
Golec de Zavala, A. (2018). Collective Narcissism: Antecedents and Consequences of Exaggeration of the In-Group Image. In A. D. Hermann, A. B. Brunell, & J. D. Foster (Eds.), Handbook of Trait Narcissism: Key Advances, Research Methods, and Controversies (pp. 79–88). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92171-6_8
Golec de Zavala, A., Federico, C. M., Sedikides, C., Guerra, R., Lantos, D., Mrozinski, B., Cypryańska-Nezlek, M., & Baran, T. (2019). Low Self-Esteem Predicts Out-group Derogation via Collective Narcissism, but this Relationship Is Obscured by In-group Satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://research.gold.ac.uk/26499/10/Revision_FINAL%20%281%29.docx
Grant, A., & Nickisch, C. (2019, May 14). How Having a Rival Improves Performance. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/ideacast/2019/05/how-having-a-rival-improves-performance
Grohs, R., Reisinger, H., & Woisetschläger, D. M. (2015). Attenuation of negative sponsorship effects in the context of rival sports teams’ fans. European Journal of Marketing, 49(11/12), 1880–1901. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2013-0010
Gubler, J. R., Kalmoe, N. P., & Wood, D. A. (2015). Them’s Fightin’ Words: The Effects of Violent Rhetoric on Ethical Decision Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2256-y
Havard, C. T. (2014). Glory Out of Reflected Failure: The examination of how rivalry affects sport fans. Sport Management Review, 17(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2013.09.002
Havard, C. T. (2018). Rivalry: How it impacts fans, teams, and sport managers. http://www.sportrivalry.com/textbook/
Havard, C. T., & Dalakas, V. (2017). Understanding the marketing implications of sport rivalry: What we know and where we are headed. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(4), 199–203.
Havard, C. T., & Eddy, T. W. (2013). Qualitative Assessment of Rivalry and Conference Realignment in Intercollegiate Athletics. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 6, 216–235.
Havard, C. T., Eddy, T. W., & Ryan, T. D. (2016). Examining the Impact of Team Identification and Gender on Rival Perceptions and Consumption Intentions of Intercollegiate Athletics Fans. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 8(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.18666/JASM-2016-V8-I2-6444
Havard, C. T., Ferrucci, P., & Ryan, T. D. (2019). Does messaging matter? Investigating the influence of media headlines on perceptions and attitudes of the in-group and out-group. Journal of Marketing Communications, 0(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1620838
Havard, C. T., Gray, D. P., Gould, J., Sharp, L. A., & Schaffer, J. J. (2013). Development and validation of the Sport Rivalry Fan Perception Scale (SRFPS). Journal of Sport Behavior, 36(1), 45–65.
Havard, C. T., & Reams, L. (2016). Investigating Differences in Fan Rival Perceptions between Conferences in Intercollegiate Athletics. Journal of Sport Behavior, 39(2), 126–146.
Havard, C. T., & Reams, L. (2018). Examining Differences among Primary and Secondary Rivals: Are Fan Perceptions, Behavioral, and Consumption Intentions Influenced by Degree of Rivalry? Journal of Applied Marketing Theory, 8(1), 28–38.
Havard, C. T., Reams, L., & Gray, D. P. (2013). Perceptions of highly identified fans regarding rival teams in US intercollegiate football and men’s basketball. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 14(1/2/3/4), 116. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2013.060628
Havard, C. T., Wann, D. L., & Grieve, F. G. (2018). Rivalry versus hate: Measuring the influence of promotional titles and logos on fan rival perceptions. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 10(2). https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20183145900
Havard, C. T., Wann, D. L., & Ryan, T. D. (2013). Investigating the Impact of Conference Realignment on Rivalry in Intercollegiate Athletics. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 22(4), 224–234.
Havard, C. T., Wann, D. L., & Ryan, T. D. (2017). Reinvestigating the Impact of Conference Realignment on Rivalry in Intercollegiate Athletics. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 9(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.18666/JASM-2017-V9-I2-8029
Havard, C. T., Wann, D. L., Ryan, T. D., & O’Neal, N. (2017). Does Time Heal all Wounds? A Case Study on Rival Perceptions Before and After Conference Realignment. International Journal of Exercise Science, 10(6), 823–832.
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010). Neural Responses to Ingroup and Outgroup Members’ Suffering Predict Individual Differences in Costly Helping. Neuron, 68(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.003
Hoogland, C. E., Ryan Schurtz, D., Cooper, C. M., Combs, D. J. Y., Brown, E. G., & Smith, R. H. (2015). The joy of pain and the pain of joy: In-group identification predicts schadenfreude and gluckschmerz following rival groups’ fortunes. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9447-9
Kilduff, G. J. (2014). Driven to Win: Rivalry, Motivation, and Performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(8), 944–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614539770
Kilduff, G. J., Elfenbein, H. A., & Staw, B. M. (2010). The Psychology of Rivalry: A Relationally Dependent Analysis of Competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 943–969. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533171
Kilduff, G. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). The spark that ignites: Mere exposure to rivals increases Machiavellianism and unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.007
Kilduff, G. J., Galinsky, A. D., Gallo, E., & Reade, J. J. (2016). Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1508–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0545
Kim, D., & Ko, Y. J. (2019). The impact of virtual reality (VR) technology on sport spectators’ flow experience and satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.040
Larkin, B., & Fink, J. S. (2018). Toward a Better Understanding of Fan Aggression and Dysfunction: The Moderating Role of Collective Narcissism. Journal of Sport Management, 33(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2018-0012
Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2009). Dejection at in-group defeat and schadenfreude toward second- and third-party out-groups. Emotion, 9(5), 659–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016815
Lehr, S. A., Ferreira, M. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). When outgroup negativity trumps ingroup positivity: Fans of the Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees place greater value on rival losses than own-team gains. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712834
Lenor, S., Lenten, L., & Mckenzie, J. (2016). Rivalry effects and unbalanced schedule optimization in the Australian Football League. Review of Industrial Organization, 49(1), 43-69. doi:10.1007/s11151-015-9495-7
Lin, H.-C., & Bruning, P. F. (2020). Comparing consumers’ in-group-favor and out-group-animosity processes within sports sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2018-0195
Liu, C. C., & Srivastava, S. B. (2015). Pulling Closer and Moving Apart: Interaction, Identity, and Influence in the U.S. Senate, 1973 to 2009. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414564182
Luellen, T. B. & Wann, D. L. (2010). Rival salience and sport team identification. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19, 97-106.
Martin, D. S., Townsend, K. M., Yun Wang, & Deshpande, G. (2019). Corporate Sponsorship in College Football: An fMRI Study Measuring the Effectiveness of Corporate Branding Across Rival Teams. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 28(4), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.32731/SMQ.284.122019.03
Mills, B. M., Tainsky, S., Green, B. C., & Leopkey, B. (2018). The Ultimatum Game in the College Football Rivalry Context. Journal of Sport Management, 32(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2017-0094
Moskalenko, S., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (2006). Group Identification under Conditions of Threat: College Students’ Attachment to Country, Family, Ethnicity, Religion, and University before and after September 11, 2001. Political Psychology, 27(1), 77–97. JSTOR.
Nichols, B., Cobbs, J., & Raska, D. (2016). Featuring the Hometown Team in Cause-Related Sports Marketing: A Cautionary Tale for League-Wide Advertising Campaigns. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 25(4), 212–226.
Nichols, B. S., Cobbs, J., & Tyler, B. D. (2019). Rival team effects in cause-related sports marketing. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-01-2019-0010
Parrish, C., & Tyler, B. D. (2018). Superclásicos and rivalry antecedents: Exploring soccer club rivalries in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. Soccer & Society, 19(5–6), 766–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2017.1399604
Piezunka, H., Lee, W., Haynes, R., & Bothner, M. S. (2018). Escalation of competition into conflict in competitive networks of Formula One drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(15), E3361–E3367. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717303115
Pike, B. E., Kilduff, G. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). The Long Shadow of Rivalry: Rivalry Motivates Performance Today and Tomorrow. Psychological Science, 29(5), 804–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617744796
Pope, S. W., & Nauright, J. (2016). American-British Sporting Rivalries and the Making of the Global Sports Industry. Comparative American Studies An International Journal, 14(3–4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2016.1242694
Popp, B., Germelmann, C. C., & Jung, B. (2016). We love to hate them! Social media-based anti-brand communities in professional football. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-11-2016-018
Popp, B., Horbel, C., & Germelmann, C. C. (2018). Social-Media-Based Antibrand Communities Opposing Sport-Team Sponsors: Insights From Two Prototypical Communities. International Journal of Sport Communication, 11(3), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2018-0082
Puzakova, M., & Aggarwal, P. (2018). Brands as Rivals: Consumer Pursuit of Distinctiveness and the Role of Brand Anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(4), 869–888. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy035
Quintanar, S. M., Deck, C., Reyes, J. A., & Sarangi, S. (2015). You are close to your rival and everybody hates a winner: A study of rivalry in college football. Economic Inquiry, 53(4), 1908–1918. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12215
Reams, L., & Eddy, T. (2017). The impact of rivalry antecedents on mediated demand for an individual sport. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(4), 247–260.
Reeves, R. A., & Tesser, A. (1985). Self-evaluation maintenance in sports team rivalries. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23(4), 329–331. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330173
Sanford, K., & Scott, F. (2016). Assessing the Intensity of Sports Rivalries Using Data From Secondary Market Transactions. Journal of Sports Economics, 17(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002514527112
Sgourev, S. V., & Operti, E. (2018). From Montagues to Capulets? Analyzing the systemic nature of rivalry in career mobility. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0662
Shoham, A., Dalakas, V., & Lahav, L. (2015). Consumer Misbehavior: Aggressive Behavior by Sports Fans. Services Marketing Quarterly, 36(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2015.976506
Smith, R. A., & Schwarz, N. (2003). Language, social comparison, and college football: Is your school less similar to the rival school than the rival school is to your school? Communication Monographs, 70(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000179142
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2017). Intergroup Threat Theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 1–12). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0162
Sung, H., Mills, B. M., & Tainsky, S. (2017). From schadenfreude to mitfreude? Estimating viewership loss and rivalrous relationships in otherwise neutral markets. Sport Management Review, 20(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.08.006
Swab, R. G., & Johnson, P. D. (2018). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competition and competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2340
To, C., Kilduff, G. J., Ordoñez, L., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2018). Going for it on fourth down: Rivalry increases risk taking, physiological arousal, and promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1281–1306. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0850
Tyler, B. David, & Cobbs, J. B. (2015). Rival conceptions of rivalry: Why some competitions mean more than others. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2015.1010558
Tyler, B. David, Cobbs, J., Satinover Nichols, B., & Dalakas, V. (2019). Schadenfreude, rivalry antecedents, and the role of perceived sincerity in sponsorship of sport rivalries. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.029
Tyler, B. David, Cobbs, J., & Xantos, Y. K. (2019). The Roots of Rivalry: Elements and Core Characteristics of Sport Rivalry. Understanding Rivalry and Its Influence on Sports Fans, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8125-3.ch001
Tyler, B.D., & Cobbs, J. (2017). All rivals are not equal: Clarifying misrepresentations and discerning three core properties of rivalry. Journal of Sport Management, 31(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2015-0371
Tyler, B.D., Morehead, C. A., Cobbs, J., & DeSchriver, T. D. (2017). What is rivalry? Old and new approaches to specifying rivalry in demand estimations of spectator sports. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(4), 204–222.
Tyler, B. D. & Cobbs, J. B. (2009, October). Advancing toward an understanding of sport rivalry. Paper presented at the meeting of the Sport Marketing Association (SMA), Cleveland, OH.
Wann, D. L., & Grieve, F. G. (2005). Biased evaluations of in-group and out-group spectator behavior at sporting events: The importance of team identification and threats to social identity. Journal of Social Psychology, 145(5), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.5.531-546
Wann, D. L., Havard, C. T., Grieve, F. G., Lanter, J. R., Partridge, J. A., & Zapalac, R. K. (2016). Investigating sport rivals: Number, evaluations and relationship with team identification. Journal of Fandom Studies, 4(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.4.1.71_1
Wann, D. L., Haynes, G., McLean, B., & Pullen, P. (2003). Sport team identification and willingness to consider anonymous acts of hostile aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 29(5), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10046
Watanabe, N. M., Pegoraro, A., Yan, G., & Shapiro, S. L. (2019). Does rivalry matter? An analysis of sport consumer interest on social media. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-07-2018-0070
Winfree, J. A. (2020). Rivalries, Bowl Eligibility, and Scheduling Effects in College Football. Journal of Sports Economics, 1527002520916915. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002520916915
Yip, J. A., Schweitzer, M. E., & Nurmohamed, S. (2018). Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.06.002
Yoon, S., Kim, K., J. Beltis, A., Logan, J., & Subramanian, G. (2019). Red Sox versus Yankees: Sports Team Rivalry, Sports Symbols, and Distance Performance. Journal of Global Sport Management, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2018.1534216
Home of rivalry research on the web. Data from over 30,000 fans. Use for research, business, fun, and curiosity. Data are free for use by others with attribution under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA). This website and the research data displayed are not endorsed by or affiliated with any league or team. The faculty researchers are employees of their respective institutions and receive university support for their research.
The research is subject to University of Massachusetts Amherst IRB protocol #2410; Northern Kentucky University IRB protocol #916.